Wakka 2006-05-09
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
This book is a peculiar mix of interesting science blended with frustratingly bad writing and poor editing. It slogs through (granted some slogging is appreciated) the entire history of physics, somewhat breathlessly leading you toward teleportation and quantum computing ... which should have been the START of the book, not the END. And the whole thing is book-ended by some heavy handed and sophmorically written sci-fi vignettes about some future dork trying to make up his mind about which planet would be suitable for tonight's dinner date ...
I counted several typos throughout the book, like "teleportee" instead of "teleported" or "heath death" instead of "heat death". Such small nits like this slipped through as tell-tale signs that this book was both written and edited in haste. It reads like nothing more than someone's assembled notes about physics history: "Person A did this experiment, which showed A. Then Person B did another experiment which showed B. They published their results in Journal B. Then guess what. Person C did an experiment and found C. Then person D discoved D. Then ... blah blah blah" ... until 200 pages of this mind-numbing chronology later, you finally get to the letter Z, if you haven't thrown the book across the room by then.
Even worse, the author goes through tortuous verbal gymnastics in an attempt to explain arcane photon experiments. Seriously, a few simple diagrams would've done wonders, but instead the reader is forced to imagine lasers and tubes and layered mirrors and all kinds of abstract junk based on the author's cryptic descriptions. Why not a nice historic diagram of Newton's apparatus, or a scematic of how the EPR paradox plays out? This lack of even a single basic diagram is the book's biggest flaw.
The comment on the book's jacket that this writer "brings characters to life" is laughable. That is the one thing this book DOES NOT DO. Explain photons and quantum entanglement for the lay-person, Hmmm, OK. It does that. List endless experiments published in journals X, Y, Z .. OK, it does that too. But it is devoid of personality, unless you find personality in a bland chronology of experiments. Which physicists may, in fact. Who knows how they think?
This is a book that is worth reading, but be prepared to skim when it is obvious that the writer is neither writing (just "listing") and the editor has stopped editing and fallen asleep (teleportee!). At the very least, drink some coffee first. If this guy is "one of the best science writers" around, as others claim, then the state of scientific writing must be in a shambles.