J. Seibert 2008-09-10
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
Note: An error lead to three stars instead of 1.
This is just a bad, bad book with virtually no storyline to speak of.
I picked this book up after reading numerous accounts of how it is an intellectual Da Vinci Code that will thrill the reader and leave him on the edge of his seat. It isn't.
The first 450 pages or so can be skipped. Really. Nothing happens to any of the characters that will play a role later on. A significant portion of these pages are nonsensical entries into a word processor that was likely used for filler. Some of these entries talk of the author's elation at finding the Find and Replace option. Others are short stories of a talentless author - that's the character he plays, a talentless author - that go no where. Either way, they don't relate to the storyline - which doesn't exist.
After you skip those first 450 pages you can really skip the rest of the book. Nothing happens that's worth reading. There are no chases. There are no close calls or anything of the sort.
The book starts off with the main character sneaking into a museum, the next 450 pages or so are of him reflecting on the events that lead to him here - not important - finally, what he's waiting for simply happens. There is no struggle. Those he is observing are not even aware he's in the museum with him. The dead is done and the book ends.
Outside of the nonexistent storyline the book is just plain silly. Anything and everything from literature is used as proof of a secret plan by the Templars.
There are a lot of places and references most Americans won't understand as they're just not familiar to us. Don't waste time on these. Umberto Eco is simply name dropping. I looked up every place or event I wasn't familiar with in the first 300 pages only to learn that none of them are related to the story.
This book just isn't worth reading. At all.