Ninja Bookworm 2008-07-29
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
Wow, if this book won the Agatha Award, there must not have been much competition that year. This is the kind of book that makes me want to fling it across that room after only a few pages, due to the very bad writing. (And it's just not the writing, some obvious mistakes were overlooked by the editor). I realize this is not high literature, but to me, such bad writing calls attention to itself, making it impossible for me to suspend disbelief.
For starters, there are pages of nonsensical dialogue (I imagine that the author must have been typing away at these pages when she was about to nod off.) I finished them and think, Huh? What? What does this have to do with anything? The author's thinking/writing at times seems confused and confusing.
And then there are mini-lessons about Japan (the language and culture.) Though I don't mind this--in fact, I read such books to experience a different culture--they are so clunkily inserted, not blended into the narrative in any sort of natural way. It's seems that the author feels, "OK, now I will give you the reader a short lesson on..." I recently finished reading all the books in the John Rain series (Barry Eisler); though this is a slightly different genre, Eisler skillfully weaves into the narrative things about Japan. I feel I am experiencing a different culture (without receiving a mini-lesson.) Like the Rain series and Japan, I also feel the same about the No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency series and Africa (I feel immersed in Africa, without noticing that the author has made me feel that way through skillful writing.)
And then some glaring mistakes. (1) A character orders cheese sandwiches. A waitress brings cheese sandwiches. People eat cheese sandwiches. A couple of pages later, a waitress brings cheese sandwiches (again!?). (2) A character chops green onions and mushrooms, sautees them, makes an omelet, and cuts the omelet into three pieces. People eat the omelet. A few pages later, the character is chopping green onions and mushrooms (preparing to make the omelet???). (3) The occasional missing (left) quotation mark. So at the end of the paragraph, upon discovering the right quotation mark, I backtrack to figure out what the character actually said, and/or what she thought, since it's not clear where I (yes, the reader is given this task) should insert the first/left missing quotation mark. (4) And then, a character invites another person to join her (but does not say where she plans on going), and the second person makes the non sequitur, "But I shouldn't eat cake." But the first character never mentioned anything about cake. And a few pages later, the first character is going to a place to eat cake. Either (a) the second character has ESP, or (b) the author made a mistake. Due to the past obvious mistakes, I have to choose (b). These are only a few examples, but they drastically decreased my belief in the author's ability to write a novel. I just couldn't believe it and just didn't care about the stock, flat characters.
But, as this is the author's first novel, maybe they have gotten better. I really wanted to like this novel, as I am interested in Japan and like reading mysteries.